Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130
Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 is located close to the center of Illinois. Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 has 33.77 square miles of land area and 0.02 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 population is 2,115. Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 median household income is $51,492 in 2010-2014. Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 median house value is $96,700 in 2010-2014. On average, Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 is close to the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 156 | 155 | 159 | 175 | 206 | 201 | 192 |
English Language Learner Students: | 5 | 6 | 2 | 27 | 48 | 58 | 9 |
Total Teachers: | 14.29 | NA | 13.60 | 15.32 | 14.80 | 14.60 | 13.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 13.29 | NA | 12.60 | 15.32 | 13.80 | 13.60 | 9.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 3.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 5.00 | 6.00 | 1.50 | 1.64 | 1.50 | 3.10 | 4.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 4.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | NA | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 0.50 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Other Support Services: | 4.00 | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 10.92 | NA | 11.69 | 11.42 | 13.92 | 13.77 | 14.77 |
Schools
Thomasboro Grade School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 201 North Phillips St, Thomasboro IL 61878 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.1% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 74.7% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 79.4% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 40% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.0% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 55% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 65% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,061,000 | $12,962 | $2,329,000 | $13,309 | $2,285,000 | $11,092 | |||
Federal: | $167,000 | $1,050 | 8.1% | $355,000 | $2,029 | 15.2% | $646,000 | $3,136 | 28.3% |
State: | $1,037,000 | $6,522 | 50.3% | $1,012,000 | $5,783 | 43.5% | $917,000 | $4,451 | 40.1% |
Local: | $857,000 | $5,390 | 41.6% | $962,000 | $5,497 | 41.3% | $722,000 | $3,505 | 31.6% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,167,000 | $13,629 | $2,113,000 | $12,074 | $2,295,000 | $11,141 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $1,827,000 | $11,491 | $1,936,000 | $11,063 | $1,982,000 | $9,621 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $977,000 | $6,145 | 53.5% | $1,013,000 | $5,789 | 52.3% | $1,010,000 | $4,903 | 51.0% |
Student and Staff Support: | $152,000 | $956 | 8.3% | $256,000 | $1,463 | 13.2% | $281,000 | $1,364 | 14.2% |
Administration: | $353,000 | $2,220 | 19.3% | $294,000 | $1,680 | 15.2% | $302,000 | $1,466 | 15.2% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $345,000 | $2,170 | 18.9% | $373,000 | $2,131 | 19.3% | $389,000 | $1,888 | 19.6% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $206,000 | $1,296 | $69,000 | $394 | $208,000 | $1,010 | |||
Construction: | $202,000 | $1,270 | $66,000 | $377 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $17,000 | $107 | $21,000 | $120 | $26,000 | $126 | |||
Total Salary: | $959,000 | $6,031 | $1,031,000 | $5,891 | $990,000 | $4,806 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $631,000 | $3,969 | 65.8% | $678,000 | $3,874 | 65.8% | $620,000 | $3,010 | 62.6% |
Other Salary: | $328,000 | $2,063 | 34.2% | $353,000 | $2,017 | 34.2% | $370,000 | $1,796 | 37.4% |
Total Benefit: | $415,000 | $2,610 | $438,000 | $2,503 | $428,000 | $2,078 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $270,000 | $1,698 | 65.1% | $290,000 | $1,657 | 66.2% | $276,000 | $1,340 | 64.5% |
Other Benefit: | $145,000 | $912 | 34.9% | $148,000 | $846 | 33.8% | $152,000 | $738 | 35.5% |
* Thomasboro Community Consolidated School District 130 was rated 2.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.